VERIXA / Resources
Resources
Everything here comes out of work actually done, and everything here is free. No email address is asked for and nothing is gated — the people who will do this themselves were never going to pay anybody, and we would rather be the company that told them how.
Four published / Updated 27 September 2026
Download
Check your own Amazon size chart in five minutes
Eight checks, in order, with a real defect from a live listing shown against each one. All of them are arithmetic, so none of them is a matter of opinion — you either have the defect or you do not. Four pages. No email required.
01 · 02 · 03
Are the bands continuous? Do any two sizes overlap? Does any value end one size and begin the next?
04 · 05 · 06
Are there decimals? Does every column hold different numbers? Does every dimension actually grow?
07 · 08
Is the measurement your category is chosen on there at all? Is there a chart behind the Size Chart link?
It also says what this cannot tell you, which is whether your garments measure what the chart claims. If the chart is consistent and returns are still high, the cause is elsewhere — and nobody should sell you a size-chart fix for a problem that is not in the size chart.
Published research
Three things we found by doing the work
Each of these came out of our own research in September 2026, including the one where the mistake was ours.
01What the returns warning actually does
Amazon’s “Frequently returned item” warning is calculated from a rolling three-month return rate, sits above the buy box before a buyer reads a single review, costs roughly 20–50% of conversion while it shows, and takes 60 to 120 days of better returns to clear. There is no appeal process. Which means the only cheap moment to deal with it is before it arrives.
Read the full mechanics02What everyone else charges
Credible help starts at about a thousand dollars and is aimed at sellers doing a million a year — one agency has a $1,000 project minimum and bills $100–$149 an hour. Below $150 there is marketplace labour without a diagnosis. Between the two there is almost nobody. We publish the whole table, including the rows where competitors are cheaper than us.
See the comparison03A mistake of our own, published
We had been finding businesses with no website by checking DNS. Then we opened each one in a browser and searched for it by name. 49.7% of them had a working website under a different domain. The lead count on our homepage fell from 471 to 260 the day we checked properly, and one business had already been emailed and told it had no site.
How we count things now